Sunday, June 29, 2014

REPORT (1967)


Experimental/Avant Garde Cinema Week Day 7

There are several experimental or avant garde films on the 1001 movie list. In trying to figure out how to deal with them, I have tried to handle these often tough nuts to crack by just watching them and trying to answer ten basic questions about them on my personally devised standardized test. So let us conclude with..

Report

1. What happens?
A news narrative of the day of the Kennedy assassination is reported with images relating to the assassination, but not in the order or in the way we have normally viewed it.

2. Was it heavy? Did it achieve total heaviosity?
It was pretty heavy. Yes, I'm giving this one the official heaviosity label.

3. What was your favorite part?
I liked that the scenes never quite seem to match what is being narrated, and challenges your perception of what you are seeing.

4. What was your least favorite part?
The part with the bullfighting was a bit off-putting at first.

5. Did you get it?
I believe I got this one.

6. Might the viewing experience have been enhanced from either prescription or non-prescription medication of some kind?
No, you need to take this one straight.

7. What about the sex?
You may see some sex appeal from the ladies in the advertisements for refrigerators and such, but these are overwhelmed by the scenes of violence.

8. What about the violence?
There are plenty of violent images during the last few minutes of Report, though the scenes of violence from the actual assassination are missing.

9. Describe this film in one sentence starting with "This is the film..."
This is the film where you may perceive an event you've looked at many times in a new way.

10. Would you watch it again?
Yes. And it would only take me 14 minutes!


                              

Saturday, June 28, 2014

VINYL (1965)


Experimental/Avant Garde Cinema Week Day 6

There are several experimental or avant garde films on the 1001 movie list. In trying to figure out how to deal with them, I have tried to handle these often tough nuts to crack by just watching them and trying to answer ten basic questions about them on my personally devised standardized test. So let us continue with..

Vinyl

1. What happens?
Blonde male in leather lifts some weights to the indifference of those behind him. This blonde guy appears to hold contempt for newspapers and ties up a guy to a pole and tortures him. He says he does bad things because he "digs it." He dances to Martha and the Vandellas. He gets into an altercation with someone he refers to as "scum baby." At this point, he is suddenly on the wrong end of an interrogation. He is strapped to a chair as a doctor examines him and someones reads the cast credits even though the movie isn't over. He is subjected to images that change his way of thinking. He is forced to wear a mask. He is released from his bondage and listens to some Kinks and some Stones and dances.

2. Was it heavy? Did it achieve total heaviosity?
I dug it enough to say it was a little heavy, but I've certainly had heavier.

3. What was your favorite part?
When I recognized the parts that were recognizable as being from Clockwork Orange, I kind of dug that.

4. What was your least favorite part?
I think this story could have been told in half the time. I didn't dig the moments of nothing happening.

5. Did you get it?
It's a bare bones adaptation of the Anthony Burgess novel A Clockwork Orange before Kubrick made an actual movie out of it. I can dig it.

6. Might the viewing experience have been enhanced from either prescription or non-prescription medication of some kind?
Too much of a high may cause the plot of Vinyl to slow down to an intolerable pace. I couldn't dig that. 

7. What about the sex?
I can't say I dug the bumping and grinding sex, though it was more figurative than anything.

8. What about the violence?
I don't dig violence, and tying someone up and putting a mask on them? I really can't dig that.

9. Describe this film in one sentence starting with "This is the film..."
This is the film that Andy Warhol made loosely following the plot of Clockwork Orange, and you're probably not going to dig it. 

10. Would you watch it again?

Probably wouldn't dig watching Vinyl again. Could possibly dig watching Andy Warhol's Bad or Andy Warhol's Dracula again. Or maybe I should just try to dig staring at some pictures of soup cans.                                

Friday, June 27, 2014

FLAMING CREATURES (1963)


Experimental/Avant Garde Cinema Week Day 5

There are several experimental or avant garde films on the 1001 movie list. In trying to figure out how to deal with them, I have tried to handle these often tough nuts to crack by just watching them and trying to answer ten basic questions about them on my personally devised standardized test. So let us continue with..

Flaming Creatures

1. What happens?
Operatic music plays. Several transvestites try on lipstick. We have a shot of someone shaking their penis. A young lady mocks protest as she is having her breast touched to the tune of Asian music. Halfhearted screaming accompanies an orgy scene. Violin music plays and we see the aftermath of the orgy...I guess. Some laying around...not much happening, frankly. More modern music plays as a drag queen comes out of a box. Nothing much happens before a couple of the people begin dancing Astaire/Rogers style. Sounds like Mariachi music now. The people spin to the dance. Look, a man points to a woman's nipple! Gene Vincent's Be-Bop-A-Lula begins playing before we get a shot of a final jiggling breast.

2. Was it heavy? Did it achieve total heaviosity?
It really wanted to be heavy, but I could pick this one up and toss it across the room with one hand. Sorry, not that heavy.

3. What was your favorite part?
Other than the fact that this was better than Blonde Cobra, I would think the diverse musical selections would be the best part.

4. What was your least favorite part?
I could have done without the penis shaking part...or the mock rape scene for that matter.

5. Did you get it?
I'm afraid I did not, though I can at least understand how someone else might, unlike Blonde Cobra!

6. Might the viewing experience have been enhanced from either prescription or non-prescription medication of some kind?
It could only help. Preferably something to make you very "giggly."

7. What about the sex?
When the characters aren't lying around, it's all about sex.

8. What about the violence?
You could look at the mock rape scene as violence. You could also look at it as farce. Or somewhere in-between.

9. Describe this film in one sentence starting with "This is the film..."
This is the film that I'm giving too much credit to for just not being Blonde Cobra!

10. Would you watch it again?
I seriously doubt it. But I'd certainly re-watch it before watching Blonde Cobra again!

Thursday, June 26, 2014

THE MAN WITH THE MOVIE CAMERA (1929, SOVIET UNION)


Experimental/Avant Garde Cinema Week Day 4

There are several experimental or avant garde films on the 1001 movie list. In trying to figure out how to deal with them, I have tried to handle these often tough nuts to crack by just watching them and trying to answer ten basic questions about them on my personally devised standardized test. So let us continue with...

The Man With the Movie Camera

1. What happens?
The man with the movie camera invites you into his movie theater and begins to show you a world outside the realm of traditional cinematic language.

2. Was it heavy? Did it achieve total heaviosity?
I weighed it and can officially declare it most heavy.

3. What was your favorite part?
The shots of late the late twenties Soviet Union is even more interesting without the confines of traditional narrative. I like the way Director Dziga Vertov shows the mechanics of society through machinery, trolleys or people just going to work And I like the fact that Vertov appears with his camera throughout reminding us this is a movie in case we begin to forget.

4. What was your least favorite part?
I do admit that I did look at the clock a couple of times while viewing, but I can't blame a particular section of the film.

5. Did you get it?
I believe I got it!

6. Might the viewing experience have been enhanced from either prescription or non-prescription medication of some kind?
Yes, I think medicinal enhancement of some kind might make you appreciate it even more.

7. What about the sex?
A woman in a slip...Some slow female discus throwers and high jumpers...A woman on the beach is topless and puts mud all over her. Yeah, there is some sex here. And 1929 sex at that!

8. What about the violence?
The filmmaker is about to get run down by a train! But he isn't, it's just a trick. Violence is averted here and throughout the film.

9. Describe this film in one sentence starting with "This is the film..."
This is the film that is the grandfather of films that tell a story in a non-traditional way.

10. Would you watch it again?
Yes, and should be one I shouldn't have waited until now to see for the first time. So, thanks 1001 book!...This almost makes up for making me watch Blonde Cobra, but not quite.

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

BLONDE COBRA (1963)


Experimental/Avant Garde Cinema Week Day 3

There are several experimental or avant garde films on the 1001 movie list. In trying to figure out how to deal with them, I have tried to handle these often tough nuts to crack by just watching them and trying to answer ten basic questions about them on my personally devised standardized test. So let us continue with...

Experimental/Avant Garde Cinema Week Day 3

There are several experimental or avant garde films on the 1001 movie list. In trying to figure out how to deal with them, I have tried to handle these often tough nuts to crack by just watching them and trying to answer ten basic questions about them on my personally devised standardized test. So let us continue with...

Blonde Cobra

1. What happens?
1001 movie reviewer Marc Siegel says: "Blonde Cobra is perhaps first and foremost a fascinating audio-visual treatment of the inimitable Jack Smith." 
I say: "I have no idea what happens or if anything happens."

2. Was it heavy? Did it achieve total heaviosity?
I'm making the call that it did not.

3. What was your favorite part?
After several minutes of a black screen the sudden rush of an actual image at least made me say, "Aha! An acutal image! That's good, right?"

4. What was your least favorite part?
The fact that I couldn't make out much of the dialogue during the film's thirty-three minutes. But I'm not totally convinced that is a bad thing.

5. Did you get it?
I like to think I'm very open minded about experimental films, but I can honestly say that I totally didn't get Blonde Cobra

6. Might the viewing experience have been enhanced from either prescription or non-prescription medication of some kind?
I don't know, but watching this made me want to take a Tums.

7. What about the sex?
No matter what team you play for, any sex to be found here is pretty darn creepy.

8. What about the violence?
Not in the film itself, but I was personally beginning to feel a bit violent by minute thirty-three.

9. Describe this film in one sentence starting with "This is the film..."
This is the film that makes Scorpio Rising look like a masterpiece by comparison.

10. Would you watch it again?
In an attempt to get some meaning out of this I did watch it again (It didn't help).


I think it's safe to say that I won't watch it a third time. Thanks for nothing, Marc Siegel!

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

DAISIES (1966, CZECHOSLOVAKIA)


Experimental/Avant Garde Cinema Week Day 2

There are several experimental or avant garde films on the 1001 movie list. In trying to figure out how to deal with them, I have tried to handle these often tough nuts to crack by just watching them and trying to answer ten basic questions about them on my personally devised standardized test. So let us continue with..

Daisies

1. What happens?
These two young chicks named Daisy get into a lot of innocent mischief involving playing with food, manipulating older men, taking baths and cutting up clothes before they get into a Cartesian conversation about the meaning of life itself and whether or not the frivolity of their existence is truly significant or just an existential....never mind, I'm not really sure what happens.

2. Was it heavy? Did it achieve total heaviosity?
There were times that it achieved a bit of heaviness, especially in a lot of the quick cuts and changes in color.

3. What was your favorite part?
The continuous editing kept me on my toes.

4. What was your least favorite part?
The continuous editing kept me off-balanced and confused

5. Did you get it?
Not until the end credit that said something to the effect that "this film is dedicated to those who only get upset over stomped-over lettuce." Thanks for the explanation, otherwise, I wouldn't have gotten it.

6. Might the viewing experience have been enhanced from either prescription or non-prescription medication of some kind?
Hallucinogenics all the way. 

7. What about the sex?
The two Daises do parade around a lot in underwear, bikinis and in bathtubs. All in a coquettish sort of way.

8. What about the violence?
The movie begins with an atomic bomb and ends with the remnants of a burned out city.

9. Describe this film in one sentence starting with "This is the film..."
This is the film that had depth, meaning and subtext and completely baffled me.
So if you are scoring at home, it's Daises 1 Me 0.

10. Would you watch it again?

I think 71 minutes with the Daisies is enough for one lifetime.

Monday, June 23, 2014

DESERET (1995)


Experimental/Avant Garde Cinema Week Day 1

There are several experimental or avant garde films on the 1001 movie list. In trying to figure out how to deal with them, I have tried to handle these often tough nuts to crack by just watching them and trying to answer ten basic questions about them on my personally devised standardized test. So let us begin with...

Deseret

1.What happens?
A narrator reads a series of New York Times stories about the Utah territory of Deseret as we simultaneously see shots of fields, deserts, waterfalls and livestock. The film starts off with black and white shots of American vistas, which I presume to be Utah. The narrator discusses such subjects as altercations between The Church of the Latter Day Saints and Native-Americans during the 1850’s. The narrator goes on to talk about Polygamy and organized violence as we see more shots of fields and deserts. We hear tales of Brigham Young and the Civil War interspersed with shots of… airplanes? We continue on into the 20th century with some color shots of what we might presume is the Utah territory and more news on the region through the World Wars and ending in the early 1990’s. To tell you the truth, I think I nodded off a bit between the part where Utah become a state and World War I.

2. Was it heavy? Did it achieve total heaviosity?
I don’t think it quite got there.

3. What was your favorite part?
I did like the way they incorporated the stories about Brigham Young into the mix. And frankly, the stories where they dished some dirt on ole B. Y. were pretty interesting.

4. What was your least favorite part?
I’m guessing that would be the early 20th century part when I nodded off. A little hazy on the details there.

5. Did you get it?
I think they were trying to tell a narrative in a different way. I get and respect that. That doesn’t mean I found it all that riveting. But I guess if I want something more exciting in this field I could always watch Ken Burns special about the National Parks!

6. Might the viewing experience have been enhanced from either prescription or non-prescription medication of some kind?
Not this time. Okay, maybe a couple of uppers to get through the slower parts.

7. What about the sex?You remember those condom commercials where they used to show wheat fields and vistas to avoid alluding to sex directly? I suppose when they showed the wheat fields and vistas during Deseret my mind occasionally wandered to thoughts of those commercials. And since condoms are related to sex…or the prevention of pregnancy…never mind…there isn’t any sex.

8. What about the violence?
There are some pretty graphic descriptions of massacres and the like, though since it is being read over waterfalls and livestock, it is up to the viewer’s imagination to visualize the carnage.

9. Describe this film in one sentence starting with "This is the film..."
This is the film that reminds be of some of those filmstrips I saw in elementary school where I would almost invariably ask my instructor, “Are we going to be tested on this?”

10. Would you watch it again?
Not unless it’s going to be on the test.



Tuesday, June 3, 2014

TWELVE YEARS A SLAVE (2013), GRAVITY (2013), DALLAS BUYERS CLUB (2013), AMERICAN HUSTLE (2013), WOLF OF WALL STREET (2013), NEBRASKA (2013), THE ACT OF KILLING (2012), THE GREAT BEAUTY (2013, ITALY)


There's a buzz among movie fans each year on the topic of which film will win at the upcoming Oscars. The  progression towards this mounts as we go through the various film festivals such as Sundance, Cannes, etc. ultimately vying for good Oscar positioning. But since I've been doing this 1001 blog for so long, when I see the Oscar nominations come up, I don't think as much about who will win, as I think about which films will be in the next edition of the 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die book! I guess I've sort of brainwashed myself in that respect.

Over the last five years, the Oscar for Best Picture nominees have extended to more films than the traditional five. So I've looked at the nominees the past few years and what made the subsequent edition of "the book." Some are only in one year's edition and are knocked out the next year, but I have been implanted with a special chip in my brain that forces me to see all movies that are in at least one edition of the book.

Here are the Oscar nominated movies from the last four years, separated by those that have been included in at least one edition of the book and those that have not made the cut in any edition. (I've added the documentary or Foreign Film winner in some cases to make an even ten for each year. since I like round numbers.)

In 2010, the 6 nominated films that made an edition of the 1001 book were:
The Hurt Locker
An Education
Avatar
District 9
Inglorious Bastards
Precious
Up 2010 (would have made my book)

The 4 nominees that have never made it in any edition were:
The Blind Side
Up
Up in the Air
The Secret in Their Eyes (foreign film winner)


In 2011, 5 nominated films made an edition of the 1001 book.
The King's Speech
Inception
The Social Network
Toy Story 3
True Grit

Winter's Bone (Would have made my list)

The five that never made the 1001 cut from the 2011 nominees were:
127 Hours
The Fighter
The Kids are Alright
Winter's Bone
In a Better World (foreign film winner)

In 2012, 6  nominated films made an edition of the 1001 book.
The Artist
The Descendants
Hugo
The Tree of Life
War Horse
A Separation (foreign film winner)

Moneyball (Probably would have made my list)
The four that never made the 1001 cut from the 2012 nominees are:
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
The Help
Midnight in Paris
Moneyball

In 2013, 6  nominated films made an edition of the 1001 book.
Argo
Amour (foreign film winner)
Django Unchained
Les Miserables
Life of Pi
Lincoln

Searching for Sugarman (Would have made my list)

The four that never made the 1001 cut from the 2013 nominees were:
Beasts of the Southern Wild
Silver Linings Playbook
Zero Dark Thirty
Searching for Sugar Man (Best Documentary Winner)


So the average seems to be six films in and four films out. So I'll go with that. Which six will make it this year? Here's what I think will make the cut. It's frankly a toss up after the first two.


2014
What I think will be in the next book:
12 Years a Slave
Gravity
Dallas Buyers Club
American Hustle
The Wolf of Wall Street
Nebraska

Twelve Years a Slave

12 Years a Slave-Absolutely will be in. All recent Best Picture winners have been in at least one edition. It's also a popular film about heart wrenching subject and was universally praised.




Gravity

Gravity-In 1972, The Godfather won three Academy Awards, but the film that won the most awards that year was Cabaret, which also won Best Director. Similarly, 12 Years of a Slave won the big award (and two others) for 2013, but Gravity took home seven awards including Alfonso Curacan's award for best director. Critically praised and a big hit, I think Gravity makes it in easily.


Dallas Buyers Club-Serious subject (AIDS and even more about pharmaceutical distribution of HIV medicine) and Academy Award winning breakthrough performance by Matthew McConahey puts this one in the book.  The last three movies featuring a Best Actor winner have made the book and I think this one does too.





American Hustle-70's nostalgia through a busy but intelligent plot about con men, the FBI and who's hustling who. Last years Oscar nominee Silver Linings Playbook didn't make last years edition with the same two lead actors and director, but despite not winning any awards for it's 10 Academy nominations, I think American Hustle makes the cut.



Wolf of Wall Street-This movie is a bit of an enigma. It is very well done, but at times very unpleasant to watch. Jordan Belfort is a detestable character in most ways, but I admit I couldn't stop watching this three hour epic, even while it often turnined my stomach. I think it's in the book.






Nebraska-This was the last film of all the nominees that I watched, and I have to admit it was my favorite of them all. It's rare that I watch a film and stop and reflect on how real the people in it are, but Nebraska made me do just that. It also has great drama, some real laughs, beautiful black and white photography and as I mentioned, real characters. It may or may not make the next edition, but obviously gets my vote.


The four that I don't think will make the cut for the next edition:
Philomena
The Great Beauty
Her
Captain Phillips

Philomena-I thought that this story of a woman trying to find her son with the aid of a reporter was a very well done. I have no reason to leave it off the list other than the fact that I think the book has got to leave something out!





The Great Beauty*-The foreign film Academy Award winner makes the book sometimes (A Separation, Amour) and sometimes it doesn't (In a Better World, The Secret In Their Eyes). Despite being a rather creative story about an Italian writer's look back at his life, somehow I don't feel this will make the cut.
Her-Imaginative film about a lonely man's relationship with his...computer operating system certainly had its moments. It did leave me a little cold, but I guess that's what a relationship with an OS will do to you. Once again, worth seeing but maybe not in the book.




Captain Phillips-The last of the Best Picture nominees and least likely to be in the book is the true life (or sort of true to life according to some accounts) of the brave Captain Phillips and his crews escape from fierce Somali pirates. It is actually a pretty good thriller, even if you know what is going to happen. I showed this one at the library and the audience really loved it. Still, I don't see it going in the book.





Possible break-ins from 2013 to the book that I see include:

The Hunt, the Oscar nominated Danish film about a man falsely accused of molesting a young girl.

Blue Jasmine, Woody Allen's loose and updated remake of A Streetcar Named Desire that features Cate Blanchett's Oscar Winning Performance.

Frozen: The Disney CGI fairy tale extravaganza which features a soundtrack that I must listen too whenever my wife and I go on a long trip.

Inside Llwelyn Davis: Because any Coen Brothers movie has the potential to make the book.

Fifty Feet From Stardom: Oscar winning documentary about backup singers was largely a feel good movie that is hard not to like and certainly recommended, but I don't think it will make the book.


The Act of Killing-The same reason why this documentary didn't win the Oscar may be a reason that it makes the next book. Indonesian death squad leaders who are still in power are asked to recreate on camera the atrocities they committed in any genre they chose. To say this one was controversial is an understatement and I think Oscar voters couldn't bring themselves to give it the award. For me, it was very hard to watch. In fact, I admit to skipping much of the middle part. The ending did have one of the abusers returning to the scene of his crimes and begin retching (above), which was the only sign of remorse I saw from anyone in the whole film. The 1001 book doesn't shy away from the controversial (see Salo or some of the experimental films listed in each edition) and I think this will make it in.


Of course, I could be totally wrong about all of this..

*Update! The Great Beauty did indeed make the cut in the next edition, so I've added it to post heading.  I was also wrong about Dallas Buyers Club making the list. But I was correct in picking the other five (and The Act of Killing) to be in. So my percentage wasn't too bad.